Headless WordPress and traditional WordPress represent two different architectural approaches to building a website. The choice between headless and traditional WordPress depends on the specific needs of a project. Headless WordPress offers advantages for complex, interactive sites that require a high degree of customization and control over the front-end. However, traditional WordPress continues to be a solid choice for many websites, especially simpler sites like blogs. This guide will explore the pros, cons, and ideal use cases of each approach.

What is Headless WordPress?

Headless WordPress, also known as decoupled WordPress, refers to separating the WordPress content management system (CMS) from the front-end presentation layer.

The “head” refers to the front-end theme, which is removed or decapitated in a headless setup. The WordPress backend becomes a content repository or headless CMS that outputs content via APIs for display in a frontend application.

Headless WordPress vs. Traditional WordPress

With traditional WordPress, the CMS and front-end theme are tightly coupled together. This means the WordPress admin interface and database are used to manage both the content and how it is displayed to visitors.

In a headless WordPress architecture, the WordPress CMS is decoupled from the presentation layer. WordPress still manages the content, but a separate front-end framework or static site generator is used for presentation and delivery. 

When deciding between a headless and traditional WordPress site, there are several key factors to consider:

Performance

One of the main benefits of headless WordPress is improved performance. By separating the backend WordPress CMS from the frontend, you avoid loading all of the PHP and database overhead on the frontend. This results in much faster initial page loads and overall performance.

With a traditional WordPress site, every page request has to load WordPress, query the database, run PHP, and render the full frontend code before returning HTML to the browser. With headless, the frontend is decoupled so it can just fetch the data it needs as JSON and render pages.

Flexibility

The decoupled architecture also provides more flexibility. The frontend codebase is completely separate, so you can build the frontend experience with any technology. This allows developers to use modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular for the frontend rather than relying on PHP templates.

The frontend code can be hosted entirely separately from WordPress as well. This makes it easy to implement different hosting, caching, and scaling strategies for the frontend vs the backend CMS.

Omni-channel Content Delivery

Since headless WordPress outputs content via APIs, the same content can be reused across many different platforms and devices. Rather than building a separate mobile app, you can reuse your WordPress content via the API.

This omni-channel approach allows you to have full native apps for mobile, single page apps for web, smart TV apps, wearable apps, digital signage, and more all powered by the same WordPress backend. This simplifies the process of repurposing content.

SEO

Both headless and traditional WordPress support excellent SEO when configured properly.

Headless sites may need extra consideration for SEO by pre-rendering pages and using solutions like Next.js to handle server-side rendering. But ultimately they can match traditional WordPress SEO.

The backend headless CMS is still WordPress, so it provides the same SEO flexibility for content modeling, URLs, metadata etc.

Complexity

Traditional WordPress is easier for less technical users since it requires minimal coding. But headless WordPress requires JavaScript/frontend expertise to build the decoupled frontend. This makes development and maintenance more complex.

So traditional WordPress is better suited for sites that don’t need a high level of customization or performance. Headless works better for advanced sites willing to take on added complexity.

Drawbacks of Headless WordPress

Headless WordPress has some drawbacks to consider:

More Complex Architecture

Headless WordPress is more complex than traditional WordPress since the frontend is decoupled from the backend. This can make development and maintenance more difficult. You need developers who understand both WordPress and JavaScript frameworks.

Need for Specialized Developers

Due to the complex architecture, you need developers skilled in WordPress and JavaScript frameworks like React or Vue. This can make hiring more challenging and expensive.

Plugins May Not Work

Many plugins are designed for traditional WordPress so they may not work properly or at all in a headless setup. There are fewer plugins specifically for headless WordPress.

Higher Initial Development Costs

The added complexity means more development time is required, which can increase costs. You need to build both the backend and frontend, instead of just using WordPress for everything.

Less CMS Functionality Out of the Box

Since you are just using WordPress as a backend, you lose built-in CMS functionality like page builders and have to rebuild it from scratch. This can add development time.

Steeper Learning Curve

There is a steeper learning curve compared to traditional WordPress. Developers need expertise in decoupled systems, WordPress REST API, JavaScript frameworks, and headless CMS best practices.

The main drawbacks center around the increased complexity and need for specialized developers for headless WordPress. You lose some CMS functionality as well.

When to Use Headless WordPress

Headless WordPress is best suited for certain types of websites and applications where the content and presentation are separated. Here are some of the main scenarios where a headless WordPress approach makes the most sense:

Content-Focused Sites

If your website is mainly focused on content rather than complex visual layouts and functionality, headless WordPress is a great option. For example, blogs, news sites, and content hubs can benefit from headless WordPress. The frontend can be optimized for content display, while WordPress handles flexible content creation and management on the backend.

Mobile and Desktop Apps

Since headless WordPress provides a content API, it can easily power mobile apps, desktop apps, smart TV apps, etc. The app handles the frontend experience while connecting to the WordPress API for content. This allows apps to provide native experiences across platforms while using WordPress as a content hub.

Internet of Things (IoT)

With the ability to output content to any device or platform, headless WordPress is ideal for powering content on IoT and connected devices like smartwatches, smart speakers, etc. The WordPress backend can manage and optimize content while outputting it via API to the unique frontend interfaces of IoT devices.

Large Enterprise Sites

For large enterprise websites with complex architecture, headless WordPress can help by decoupling the frontend and backend. This allows frontend developers to use the technologies and frameworks best suited for the frontend experience. The backend WordPress system focuses solely on content management.

So in summary, if you need content APIs, want UI flexibility, require native apps, or have a large complex site, headless WordPress is likely the best approach. The decoupled architecture unlocks flexibility and optimizes both the frontend UI and backend CMS.

When Not to Use Headless WordPress

Headless WordPress may seem like an exciting new approach, but it’s not the right choice for every website. Here are some instances when you may want to stick with traditional WordPress:

Simple Brochure Sites

If you just need a basic informational website with a few pages showcasing your business, products, or services, a headless setup might be overkill. Traditional WordPress works great for simple “brochure” style sites. You can use a templated theme and page builder to quickly create an attractive site without needing to build a complex decoupled architecture.

Blogs

For blogs and online magazines, a traditional WordPress site is likely the better option. The integrated WP admin dashboard offers powerful tools for managing posts, comments, categories, authors, and more. Attempting to recreate these content management capabilities on the frontend would take considerable work.

Small Business Websites

If you run a local brick-and-mortar business, traditional WordPress is a tried-and-true solution. You can use it to build a professional website with all the essential pages – About, Services, Contact, etc. The ecosystem of plugins and themes make it easy to add ecommerce, booking, and other functionality as your business grows. For most small sites, headless WordPress provides more complexity than needed.

So in summary, if you just need a standard WordPress site without extensive customization, an integrated platform is often the simpler, more cost-effective choice compared to decoupled architecture. Headless WordPress shines for large, complex sites where flexibility and scalability are key requirements.

Implementing Headless WordPress

Implementing a headless WordPress architecture requires some key considerations around hosting, plugins, and integrations.

Hosting

For hosting, you’ll want a managed WordPress host that specializes in headless WordPress implementations. Key things to look for include:

– Built-in caching and performance optimization features specifically for headless sites. This is important since all rendering happens on the frontend.

– CDN integration to serve static assets quickly across the globe.

– Automated caching purges when content changes.

– High memory/CPU resources to handle additional API requests.

– HTTP/2 support for fast content delivery.

Plugins

These plugins are useful for a headless WordPress setup:

– WPGraphQL – Provides a GraphQL API endpoint for your content. This is the core of a headless implementation.

– WPSyncDB – Sync your production and staging databases for easier headless development.

– WP REST Cache – Caches REST API responses for better performance.

– Custom Post Type UI – Easily create custom post types for your decoupled frontend.

– Advanced Custom Fields – Build custom fields for your content models.

Integrations

On the integration side, you’ll need to connect your headless WordPress backend to a frontend framework or static site generator. Popular options include:

– Next.js

– GatsbyJS

– NuxtJS

– Vue

– React

– Angular

Each has different methods for sourcing data from WordPress. You’ll also need to integrate authentication using JWT.

Overall, headless WordPress requires some new hosting, plugins, and integrations compared to a traditional setup. But the flexibility and performance gains make it worthwhile for modern web projects.

When deciding between headless WordPress and traditional WordPress, there are a few key factors to consider.

Headless WordPress tends to make the most sense for:

– Content-focused sites and applications that need to distribute content to various platforms

– Sites and apps with complex or dynamic front-end needs

– Projects that require a great deal of customization

– Situations where the backend CMS and frontend need to be decoupled

Traditional, monolithic WordPress is likely the better choice for:

– Smaller blogs and basic brochure sites

– Sites where the backend and frontend don’t need to be separated

– Projects with simple content and presentation needs

– Developers who want to build everything within WordPress

Popular Headless CMS Options

Headless CMS options have proliferated in recent years as the Jamstack architecture has gained popularity. Here are some of the most popular options:

WordPress

WordPress powers over 40% of all websites, making it the most widely used CMS. The WordPress REST API allows WordPress to be used as a headless CMS. There are plugins like WPGraphQL that enhance the API and optimize WordPress for headless.

Contentful 

Contentful is a SaaS headless CMS designed from the ground up as an API-first platform. It uses a JSON data model and offers robust content modeling capabilities. Contentful integrates nicely with static site generators like Gatsby and Next.js.

Drupal

Drupal has offered decoupled capabilities for many years through its REST API. The latest versions of Drupal are API-first, optimized for headless use cases. There is an extensive module ecosystem around Drupal.

Craft CMS

Craft CMS is a flexible, developer-focused headless CMS. It is self-hosted but has a SaaS version available. Craft provides a GraphQL API out of the box and has strong multi-site capabilities.

Others

Some other popular headless CMS options include Sanity, Strapi, Directus, Prismic, and Butter CMS. There are also niche headless CMS tools for specific use cases like e-commerce, localization, etc. The headless CMS landscape continues to evolve rapidly.

In summary, headless WordPress offers greater flexibility and decoupling, but involves more complexity. Traditional WordPress is simpler for basic sites. Evaluate your content, functionality, and technical needs to determine if a decoupled or monolithic approach is right for your project. With an understanding of the pros, cons and use cases, you can make an informed decision between headless and traditional WordPress.

Bio

WebHub is your one-stop partner for digital success. Our team of experts in web design, development, marketing, and creative fields works together to craft custom solutions that propel your business forward. We believe in building trust and exceeding expectations through exceptional service, quality, and transparency.